PENYERAHAN TANAH RIZAB TENTERA

July 22nd, 2010 Tunku Aziz No comments

JAWAPAN LISAN DEWAN NEGARA YBM TUNKU ABDUL AZIZ BIN TUNKU IBRAHIM PADA 22 JULAI 2010

SOALAN:

Tunu Abdul Aziz bin Tunku Ibrahim minta MENTERI KEWANGAN menyatakan rasional dan asas pemberian tanah rizab tentera di Lembah Klang kepada swasta tanpa mempunyai satu sistem lelongan uang berkepentingan umum.

JAWAPAN:

Tuan yang Di-Pertua,

Untuk makluman Yang Berhormat, tanah rizab tentera di Lembah Klang tidak diberikan kepada syarikat swasta sebaliknya diberikan kepada syarikat Kerajaan dan badan berkanun Persekutuan untuk dibangunkan.

STATISTIK AIDS

July 21st, 2010 Tunku Aziz No comments

SOALAN LISAN TUNKU ABDUL AZIZ BIN TUNKU IBRAHIM DI DEWAN NEGARA PADA 20 JULAI 2010

SOALAN:

Tunku Abdul Aziz bin Tunku Ibrahim minta MENTERI KESIHATAN menyatakan;

a) Jumlah pesakit HIV mengikut kategori pengguna dadah yang menggunakan suntikan, heteroseksual dan homoseksual.

JAWAPAN:

Tuan Yang di-Pertua,

Kes pertama HIV di negara ini telah dilaporkan pada tahun 1986 dan kumulatif kes jangkitan HIV pada akhir tahun 2009 adalah seramai 87,710 kes. Dari jumlah ini, seramai 15,317 kes telah disahkan sebagai pesakit AIDS. Sehingga akhir 2009, seramai 13,394 orang telah meninggal dunia. Ini menunjukkan seramai 74,316 pembawa HIV yang masih hidup pada akhir tahun 2009. Dari jumlah kumulatif ini, sebanyak 61,947 adalah di kalangan penagih dadah secara suntikan, 14,848 adalah di kalangan heteroseksual dan 1,747 adalah di kalangan homoseksual.

Didapati juga peratus jangkitan HIV di kalangan penagih dadah secara suntikan menunjukkan penurunan yang berterusan dari 74.7% (2000) kepada 66.0% (2005) dan 55.2% (2009). Sejajar dengan ini, peratus jangkitan di kalangan heteroseksual didapati meningkat dari 17.7% (2000) kepada 3.4% (2005) dan 5.3% (2009). Juga didapati 75% kes jangkitan HIV di kalangan wanita adalah melalui hubungan seksual (heteroseksual).

Walaupun tren-tren jangkitan melalui hubungan seks di atas menunjukkan peningkatan, namun jumlah keseluruhan kes-kes yang dilaporkan adalah berkurangan setiap tahun, Untuk makluman, tren jangkitan bilangan kes HIV yang dilaporkan di Malaysia telah menunjukkan penurunan berterusan mulai tahun 2003. Bilangan tertinggi dikesan pada tahun 2002 (6978 kes atau 26.5 bagi 100,000 penduduk) kepada 3,080 kes (10.8 bagi setiap 100,000 peduduk) pada tahun 2009.

Categories: Dewan Negara Tags:

UCAPAN PENANGGUHAN – PERBELANJAAN KEMENTERIAN PERTAHANAN

July 21st, 2010 Tunku Aziz No comments

UCAPAN PENANGGUHAN – PERBELANJAAN KEMENTERIAN PERTAHANAN

Saya ingin mengucapkan terima kasih kepada Tuan Yang Di pertua kerana mengizinkan saya membaca ucapan penangguhan Rancangan Malaysia ke 10 ini.

Rancangan Malaysia ke-sepuluh telah diumumkan pada bulan Jun dan ini adalah rancangan pembangunan lima tahun yang paling penting dalam pembangunan Malaysia. Ia merangkumi pembangunan semua sektor Negara termasuk bidang sosial, ekonomi, keselamatan dan pertadbiran am.

Angkatan tentera adalah tembok atau tulang belakang pertahanan keselamatan Negara. Boleh dikatakan tanpa pengorbanan anggota angkatan tentera dahulu dan sekarang, kita tidaklah dapat menikmati kesejahteraan dan keamanan pada hari ini.

Tetapi apa yang menghairankan ialah Rancangan Malaysia yang baru dibentang baru-baru ini, langsung tidak menyentuh pembangunan keupayaan pertahanan dan angkatan tentera. Dalam dokumen RMK 10 yang setebal 449 muka surat ini langsung tidak menyentuh sepatah perkataan mengenai pertahanan.

Berdasarkan maklumat am yang diberi oleh RMK 10, sektor keselamatan mendapat 10% dari RM230 billion peruntukan. Daripada jumlah tersebut, berapakah peruntukan dalam bidang pertahanan dan juga pecahan peruntukan kepada Polis, Agensi Penguatkuasa Maritim Malaysia dan Angkatan Tentera.

Selain itu, saya ingin menyentuh perkara senarai perolehan kelengkapan tentera dibawah RMK 10. Sebelum itu, saya telah menghantar soalan kepada kementerian pertahanan mengenai senarai perolehan kelengkapan untuk lima tahun depan, tetapi soalan saya ditolak kerana ianya didakwa menyentuh kerahsiaan.

Tambahan lagi, soalan-soalan saya yang menyentuh perolehan kelengkapan yang sedang dan siap dilaksanakan juga ditolak atas alasan yang sama. Saya ingin menegaskan di sini bahawa adalah tidak munasabah menolak soalan-soalan tersebut memandangkan isu-isu menyentuh rahsia ketenteraan tidak wujud.

Pertama, saya memahami pembelian kelengkapan tentera adalah sensitif dan perlu menjaga rahsia ketenteraan seperti unsur-unsur spesifikasi dan atur gerak.

Tetapi, soalan yang ditanya bukan bertujuan untuk mendapat rahsia ketenteraan seperti yang disebut, tetapi untuk mendapat maklumat latar belakang pembelian dan pembangunan kelengkapan tentera yang telah diumumkan oleh Kementerian Pertahanan sendiri.

Jikalau Kementerian Pertahanan sendiri yang membuat pengumuman pembelian kelengkapan tersebut, maka ini tidaklah dikira sebagai rahsia lagi. Saya menyentuh:

1. pembelian Vera-E Radar Pasif dari Omnipol, Republik Czech yang telah beberapa kali dicatatkan dalam Laporan Tahunan Kementerian Pertahanan 2007 dan 2008. Dan laporan tersebut telah menyatakan projek timbal balas Vera-E sedang dipantau oleh kementerian.

2. pembelian Cruise Missile diumumkan oleh bekas Timbalan Menteri Pertahanan sendiri di Dewan Rakyat.

3. Institut Penyelidikan Sains dan Teknologi Pertahanan (STRIDE) yang telah menunjukkan peluru berpandu Taming Sari XK98 keseluruh negara pada 31 Ogos 2007 bersempena Perarakan Merdeka 2007 di Dataran Merdeka.

Kedua, pembelian kelengkapan ketenteraan adalah mengguna peruntukan awam dan perlu mendapat persetujuan Parlimen. Oleh itu, adalah munasabah dan kepatutuan untuk ahli parlimen membincang dan mengetahui latar belakang atau basic information (dengan izin) pembelian kelengkapan ketenteraan yang mahal ini.

Ketiga, Ahli Parlimen dan rakyat mempunyai hak untuk mengetahui senarai pembelian kelengkapan ketenteraan yang akan dilancar pada lima tahun depan iaitu dalam Rancangan Malaysian Kesepuluh. Memandangkan pembelian kelengkapan ketenteraan adalah sangat mahal dan mudah berlaku penyelewengan, maka adalah perlu dipantau oleh Parlimen dan rakyat supaya berselaras dengan prinsip-prinsip good governance (dengan izin) dan meningkatkan lagi ketelusan kerajaan.

8 Billion untuk membeli 257 buah Kereta Perisai AV8

Kerajaan baru mengumumkan di DSA 2010 pada 20 April 2010 yang mana akan membelanja RM 8 billion yang mana adalah perolehan terbesar dalam sejarah Malaysia untuk memperolehi 257 buah kereta perisai pembawa anggota AV8 dari syarikat DEFTECH dan FNSS supaya mengganti semua kereta Condor dan Sibmas yang sudah usang. Ini bermaksud, secara amnya , setiap AV8 berkos RM31 juta!

Walaupun difahamkan RM8 bilion ini merangkumi RM 400 juta bagi membangunkan kemudahan DEFTECH di Pekan, dan juga kos R&D dan integrasi dan ujian, namun angka tersebut tidaklah munasabah sehingga mencecah beberapa billion ringgit. Selain itu, berbanding dengan program pembangunan kereta perisai 8×8 di luar Negara, ia juga dilihatkan satu jumlah yang amat tinggi. Mengikut kajian, purata kos sebuah kereta perisai 8×8 ialah 2 -3 juta USD, atau dalam RM ialah 10 juta lebih. Kenapa AV8 kita ini mahal hampir dua kali ganda dari luar negeri?

Pihak Kementerian juga tidak menjelaskan bagaimana RM8 bilion ini diguna dalam pecahan kos R&D, ujian, integrasi, pembangunan infrastruktur, kos pembelian harta intelek dari Turkey’s FNSS Company dan unit kos. Kenapa perolehan ini adalah melalui direct negotiation (dengan izin), bukan secara tender terbuka memandangkan ia menelan wang yang begitu tinggi.

Soalan Bajet 2010

Anggaran perbelanjaan mengurus 2010 telah menunjukkan penurunan dalam bidang latihan, logistic, operasi dan pengurusan. Adakah penurunan yang banyak ini akan menjejaskan quality latihan dan keberkesanan melaksanakan operasi-operasi? Tetapi, di sini telah timbul satu soalan. Mengikut permerhatian terhadap prestasi budget KEMENTAH, difahamkan bahawa KEMENTAH secara kebiasaannya membuat anggaran perbelanjaan tahun depan kurang dari sebenar yang diperlukan. Misalnya, dalam budget 2009 menunjukkan anggaran perbelanjaan latihan untuk pertahanan darat 2008 adalah RM35,472,600. Tapi, di dalam budget 2008 untuk perkara sama adalah dicatatkan sebagai RM19,072,600. Di manakah angka yang sebenarnya?

KEMENTAH sepatutnya memberi maklumat yang lebih tepat dalam budget tahunan. Janganlah memberi penilaian yang rendah dari sebenar atau diperlukan. Apakah dasar yang digunapakai KEMENTAH di dalam membuat anggaran ini? Apa statistic dan formula yang digunakan? Dan, adakah kerana tiap-tiap kali Kementerian memberi anggaran rendah mengakibatkan kementerian terpaksa memohon peruntukan tambahan dalam sidang dewan parlimen masa depan?

Selain itu, saya melihat anggaran perbelanjaan pembangunan untuk tiga perkhidmatan membeli perlengkapan yang dicatatkan di dalam budget 2010 ialah RM10. Mungkin pihak kementerian boleh jelaskan peruntukan RM10 yang dinyatakan tersebut.

Sekian ucapan penggulungan saya .

Senators urge Chief Secretary to intervene in Penang

July 20th, 2010 Tunku Aziz No comments

By Yoges Palaniappan (Malaysian Insider)

KUALA LUMPUR, July 20 — Three Pakatan Rakyat (PR) senators have urged the Chief Secretary to the Government to solve the ongoing spat between Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng and state development officer (SDO) Nik Ali Nik Yunus.

Tunku Abdul Aziz Ibrahim, Datuk Mustafa Kamal Mohd Yusoff and Dr S. Ramakrishnan said the chief secretary “must remind civil servants that it is their duty to provide the best possible service to the state administration and rakyat”.

“In this case, the civil servant [Nik Ali] somehow feels that his loyalty is not to the people of Penang or the elected government, but to the federal government,” Tunku Aziz (picture) told reporters.

He and the others were commenting on the recent outburst by Nik Ali who said Lim had lowered the status of a chief minister by attacking an SDO”.

Nik Ali had also distributed a press statement condemning Lim for dragging him into the issue of alleged sand mining in Balik Pulau.

Pulau Betong assemblyman Muhamad Farid Saad claimed last week that illegal sand excavation was taking place at a plot in Kampung Kenanga which had been earmarked for a government polytechnic.

Lim had responded that it would be difficult for the state to probe the matter as he had not received co-operation from the state development office headed by Nik Ali.

Tunku Aziz stressed that civil service employees, particularly senior civil servants, must understand their role in the context of the state administration.

He said a civil service that was not neutral and took sides could not be expected to deliver efficiently.

“I think if this trend continues, it is going to cause a lot of problems particularly in those states which are now governed by Pakatan Rakyat,” he added.

Tunku Aziz also urged the civil service to remember that it was serving the rakyat through a mechanism which is the state government.

“A good servant must serve the state government faithfully and wholeheartedly because it is a duly-elected government with responsibility to serve the state,” he said, adding that it was wrong for a civil servant to act as an independent arbiter or dictator.

Mustafa agreed with Tunku Aziz, saying whether or not the civil service liked the state administration, it must serve the government of the day in the interest of the people.

“The chief minister of Penang is responsible for delivering to the state and the role of the state development officer, although he’s a federal-appointed civil servant, is to work alongside the chief minister,” he said.

“There must be mutual respect between civil servants and the state administration,” he added.

Ramakrishnan concurred and said Nik Ali “should not act like he was the federal-appointed alternate chief minister.”

Categories: Dewan Negara Tags:

Program NSEP bagi Mengurangkan Penyebaran HIV / AIDS

July 19th, 2010 Tunku Aziz No comments

JAWAPAN LISAN DEWAN NEGARA TUNKU ABDUL AZIZ PADA 19 JULAI 2010

SOALAN:

Tunku Abdul Aziz bin Tunku Ibrahim minta MENTERI KESIHATAN menyatakan keberkesanan Program Pertukaran Jarum dan Picagari dalam mengurangkan penyebaran HIV/AIDS dan statistik berkaitan.

JAWAPAN:

Tuan Yang di-Pertua,

Kerajaan telah memutuskan untuk melaksanakan Pertukaran Jarum dan Picagari (NSEP) yang merupakan salah satu komponen program pengurangan mudarat sejak Februari 2006. Perlaksanaan program ini adalah bertujuan untuk mengurangkan risiko jangkitan HIV/AIDS di kalangan penagih dadah suntikan. Program NSEP ini telah dilaksanakan dengan komitmen dan kerjasama Kerajaan dan badan bukan kerajaan khususnya Majlis AIDS Malaysia. Sehingga Mac 2010 sebanyak duabelas (12) buah badan bukan kerajaan (NGO) di bawah naungan Majlis AIDS Malaysia telah melaksanakan aktiviti tersebut di 279 lokasi, Sebanyak 22 buah klinik kesihatan kerajaan turut terlibat melaksanakan aktiviti tersebut. Sehingga Mac 2010, seramai 19,911 orang klien (penagih dadah suntikan) telah mengikuti program ini.

Pengalaman di 71 buah negara yang melaksanakan program pengurangan mudarat khususnya program NSEP telah membuktikan bahawa pendekatan tersebut berkesan dalam mengurangkan jangkitan HIV di kalangan penagih dadah suntikan di negara yang melaksanakannya. Di Malaysia, peratus jangkitan HIV di kalangan penagih dadah yang dilaporkan di Malaysia telah menunjukkan penurunan 66% pada tahun 2005 kepada 55% pada tahun 2009 berikutan perlaksanaan program pengurangan mudarat termasuk NSEP pada tahun 2006. Kajian Integrated Bio Behavioural Surveillance (IBBS) 2009 yang dilaksanakan ke atas 630 orang penagih dadah suntikan di Lembah Klang, mendapati peratus amalan berkongsi jarum (semasa menagih) telah menurun kepada 12.7% berbanding 42.1% pada tahun 2004. Kekerapan berkongsi jarum juga menurun di mana 2.3% peratus penagih dadah suntikan ini berkongsi jarum lebih dari lima kali seminggu (IBBS 2009) berbanding 15.9% pada tahun 2004. Kesedaran dan pengetahuan penagih dadah mengenai HIV / AIDS didapati tinggi dengan 95% daripada penagih dadah tersebut mempunyai pengetauan mengenai HIV. Jelas bahawa perlaksanaan program pengurangan mudarat termasuk NSEP telah dapat mengurangkan penularan HIV di kalangan kumpulan sasar di Malaysia.

Status Projek Pembinaan 27 Buah Kapal NGPV

July 19th, 2010 Tunku Aziz No comments

JAWAPAN LISAN DEWAN NEGARA TUNKU ABDUL AZIZ PADA 19 JULAI 2010

SOALAN:

Tunku Abdul Aziz bin Tunku Ibrahim minta MENTERI PERTAHANAN menyatakan status projek pembinaan 27 buah NGPV:-

a) adakah 27 buah masih relevan dan TLDM telah tukar permintaan ke-18 buah; dan
b) minta penjelasan NGPV Batch 2 yang bakal dilaksanakan dari segi tempoh, bilangan, peruntukan dan permintaan misi.

JAWAPAN:

Tuan Yang di-Pertua,

Berdasarkan memorandum yang ditandatangani oleh kerajaan dan Penang Shipping Cooperation – Naval Dockyard (PSC-ND) kini dikenali Boustead Naval Shipyard (BNS) pada tahun 1995 telah menghasratkan untuk limbungan tersebut membina 27 buah kapal ronda bagi kegunaan TLDM. Jumlah tersebut diambilkira untuk TLDM menggantikan kapal-kapal dari kelas Patrol Craft yang diserahkan kepada Agensi Penguatkuasaan Maritim Malaysia (APMM) dan Fast Attack Craft yang menjangkau usia melebihi 45 tahun menjelang tahun 2015. Buat masa ini, jumlah tersebut masih relevan tetapi pembinaan kap-kapal tersebut akan mengambil kira kemampuan kewangan Kerajaan melalui peruntukan Rancangan Malaysia setiap lima tahun.

Bagi perolehan di dalam NGPV Batch 2, Kementerian telah menyenaraikan projek tersebut di dalam RMK-10. Kementerian merancang untuk membina enam buah kapal lagi di BNS dan tempoh pelaksanaan akan berlanjutan ke RMK-11. Dari segi misi, kapal-kapal tersebut akan mempunyai keupayaan perang tiga dimensi.

Sebagai maklumat, status projek NGPV yang dilaksanakan oleh Boustead Naval Shipyard (BNS) bagi kumpulan pertama iaitu lima buah daripadanya telah siap dan beroperasi di dalam Armada TLDM. Manakala sebuah algi kapal akan diserahkan kepada TLDM pada penghujung Ogos 2010.

DAP Events to Commemorate TBH1

July 15th, 2010 Tunku Aziz No comments

This is to inform that DAP will be organizing the following events to commemorate the First Anniversary of Teoh Beng Hock’s Passing:-

Event (1): Prayer Session, with TBH’s Parents
Date: 16th July 2010 (Friday)
Time: 10am
Venue: Plaza Masalam, Shah Alam

Event (2): DAP Major TBH1 Ceramah
Date: 16th July 2010 (Friday)
Time: 7.30pm
Venue: KL and Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall, No.1, Jalan Maharajalela, 50150 Kuala Lumpur.

Speakers: 1. YB Lim Kit Siang, DAP Parliamentary Leader and MP for Ipoh Timur
2. YAB Lim Guan Eng, DAP Secretary-General and Penang Chief Minister
3. YB Tan Kok Wai, DAP National Vice Chairman and MP for Cheras
4. YB Ean Yong Hian Wah, Selangor Exco and DAP Selangor Chairman
5. YB Loke Siew Fook, DAPSY National Chairman and MP for Rasah
6. YB Teng Chang Khim, Speaker of Selangor State Assembly
7. YB Gobind Singh Deo, MP for Puchong
8. YB Nurul Izzah Anwar, MP for Lembah Pantai
9. Teoh Lee Lan, sister of the late Teoh Beng Hock

Link: http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/event.php?eid=139919956021415

Event (3): TBH1 Major Memorial Ceremony
Date: 17th July 2010 (Saturday)
Time: 8.30am
Venue: Nirvana Memorial Park (Christian Memorial Park), Taman Harmoni, 43500 Semenyih.

Guests: 1. MP Lim Kit Siang
2. MP Fong Kui Lun
3. MP Tan Kok Wai
4. MP Loke Siew Fook
5. Exco Ean Yong Hian Wah
6. Exco Teresa Kok
7. Exco Ronnie Liu
8. MP Tony Pua
9. Exco Dr.Xavier
10. ADN Jenice Lee and etc

Event (4): TBH1 Memorial Ceremony in Serdang
Date: 17th July 2010 (Saturday)
Time: 8pm
Venue: Pusat Khidmat DAP Serdang, No.1121-1B, Jalan Sekolah, 43000 Seri Kembangan, Selangor.

Speakers: YB Ean Yong Hian Wah and YB Teo Nie Ching

Contact: LIM Swee Kuan (016-209 8319)

Invitation by,
YB Ean Yong Hian Wah’s Office

Categories: Activity Tags:

TURNING MACC INTO A LAW UNTO ITSELF

July 3rd, 2010 Tunku Aziz No comments

A certain member of Parliament heading an MACC committee has suggested that MACC should not only be given more money, as if the tens of millions of ringgit of government funds already dished out are still insufficient, but also the power to prosecute cases investigated by that organisation itself. A monstrous idea even if the MACC had a reputation for the highest professional integrity which, of course, it hasn’t. The fact of the matter is that this much touted independent corruption fighting outfit modelled on the Hong Kong ICAC continues to be regarded with a degree of disdain.

The MACC does not enjoy the cachet and the public trust and confidence of the Malaysian public. Only corrupt politicians and public servants have complete trust in the MACC, but, sadly, for all the wrong reasons. Someone somewhere has to have his head examined for even thinking of making the MACC a law unto itself. Has the YB concerned not heard of the need for a system of checks and balances or the vital necessity of avoiding a conflict of interest situation in the conduct of public affairs as a means of reducing corruption? The whole harebrained suggestion is akin to allowing the Attorney-General to double as a judge in a case he has decided as AG to prosecute! He may well relish the idea, but will justice be served in the process? Or perhaps we don’t care.

The MACC is apparently only good at bleating about insufficient funding. Many anti- corruption agencies in countries much larger and better endowed than Malaysia would drop on their knees to thank God the Almighty for a drop of what we apportion to the MACC to do the work expected of them, but sadly they have failed to deliver. It is really quite pointless defending them on the grounds that they are still new. The acronym MACC may be new, and we sometimes forget that this is the same old wine-turned vinegar presented in a new bottle. By continually saying that they need even more resources, they are publicly admitting, and Transparency International HQ in Berlin please note, that corruption in Malaysia has become endemic in the system and has assumed Sub-Saharan African proportions. By their own admission, they have failed to arrest the spiralling problem of corruption in this country.

If the corrupt are crawling thick on the ground, in their thousands, why is it that the MACC has been so singularly unsuccessful in pulling in the bigger species such as cabinet ministers, chief ministers, menteris besar and others of their ilk? By your failure, are you intimating that Malaysian public figures are men and women of probity, honour, integrity and totally incorruptible? The money you ask for will be there, but we want to see some results. Is that too much to ask of our MACC that is proudly trumpeted and proclaimed as being based on the Hong Kong anti-corruption model? You can adopt any model, but do not forget that external factors can only be as influential as your internal weaknesses will allow. To use a soccer analogy, do you think adopting the German soccer model will make the slightest bit of difference to the moribund Malaysian national soccer team?

The MACC will not earn its spurs unless and until it is placed under “an all-party” parliamentary committee, and not Najib who himself has many allegations of impropriety to contend with. I do not believe that the chief commissioner has the courage to investigate allegations of corruption against the Prime Minister, and other high officers of state under existing arrangements. Your claims to professional independence in the present circumstances are nothing if not spurious to say the least.

The MACC is its own worst enemy. It is run, and I have no doubt in my mind, by people who are totally unsophisticated in the art of damage control. Even with its reputation in tatters resulting from its questionable interrogation methods in the Teoh Beng Hock case, it is insistent that it will not allow a video camera into the room in which its officers will record a statement of a witness in London which they are going to conduct shortly. It will also not allow a lawyer to be present during the interview of the witness. I am totally lost for words to describe the obtuseness of our corruption fighters. How on earth do they expect us to take them seriously when they cannot appreciate the fact that their actions are under constant scrutiny, and we are watching for signs that they can be trusted? They have to earn our trust by their actions which have to be grounded firmly in public duty for the public good. In short, In God We Trust, in the MACC we don’t without first seeing the colour of their money. Our “independent” MACC has its work cut out for it.

Categories: Corruption, Opinion Tags:

Hindus first, before becoming Muslim

July 1st, 2010 Tunku Aziz No comments

By Koh Lay Chin | Thenutgraph |

BEFORE Senator Tunku Abdul Aziz Ibrahim became a politician, he was far better known as a Malaysian champion of transparency, integrity and good governance. Indeed, it was no coincidence that Tunku Aziz, together with like-minded individuals, founded Transparency International Malaysia (TI-Malaysia) in 1998. He was TI-Malaysia president until December 2004.

Even after setting up TI-Malaysia, the former Bank Negara advisor actively promoted ethics and good governance at both the regional and international level. This included work within the World Bank and the United Nations. It was in his capacity as special advisor to the UN secretary-general, a post he was appointed to in 2006, that he set up the UN Ethics Office.

He returned from New York on completion of this work in 2007, and in 2008 joined DAP, a party he had been monitoring for the past 20 years “without their knowledge”. He is currently DAP national vice-chairperson, and was appointed as the first DAP senator in July 2009.

In this 1 June 2010 interview with The Nut Graph at his Kuala Lumpur home, Tunku Aziz talks about his royal Hindu ancestry and what it was like living in the days before and after independence.

TNG: Where were you born, and what were your earliest childhood memories?

Tunku Aziz: I was born in Alor Star in 1934. My father was an officer in the Kedah state police. My earliest memories were of the parades that were held frequently, accompanied by the Kedah state police band. I suppose that was how I have come to love military music and brass bands.

We were literally surrounded by police families when I was born. Those days in Kedah, there were two avenues for young men — the Kedah civil service and the Kedah state police. My father’s elder brother opted for the civil service, and my father became a police officer.

There was a lot of freedom to play with friends of all races. There was no homework in the lower classes, and no big school bag to lug around. My childhood memories are filled with going swimming in the river at Gurun and Kulim without telling my mother. Things like that. [But] my mother always knew if I had been swimming because my red eyes gave me away.

Can you trace your ancestry?

My family history goes back several hundred years. We can trace our origins from the days of the Hindu kingdom. My ancestors were Hindu before they became Muslim. I descended from the line of Sultan Abdullah, who had two sons, Sultan Ahmad Shah and Tunku Yaakob, also known as Tunku Embong. He, being the younger, became the Raja Muda. In short, that is my family tree.

As I have indicated, the present Kedah ruler can trace his lineage back to the first Hindu king of Kedah. It is the country’s oldest royal line. My mother was a dayang from Brunei whose elder sister married my father’s elder bother — two brothers marrying two sisters.

With the late Corazon Aquino, former president of the Philippines, circa 2000, in his capacity as TI-Malaysia president

What are the childhood stories you remember the most?

Probably the most important advice that my father gave to me went something like this. That it is no use driving a big, expensive car if people in the coffee shops are going to say, as you drive by, “Look at that [person] driving a big car. He [or she] is on the take.”

That made a strong impression on me, because this is where self worth comes into the picture. And if you have no self respect to begin with, you have no respect for other people. This is why I have always tried to resist any temptation to take a bribe, knowing full well that I would never be able to live with myself.

[My father] was a stickler for rules. I remember as an 11-year-old, [I] had my own [football] team that played matches in kampongs some four or five miles away. He would always remind me to ensure that when I cycled home in the evening, my bicycle had a light. Followed by, “If you are caught riding without a lamp, don’t claim that you are the son of the OCPD.” He was then the Alor Star OCPD!

How do you connect with these stories as a Malaysian?

I come from the state of Kedah, which was an independent country before it became a protected state of the British empire. The people of Kedah ran their own affairs and there was a sense of confidence. Unlike [Malay Malaysians] in the other parts, except for Johor, who were virtually under British control and domination. I think when you have confidence in your ability to deal with people, then you don’t worry too much about the ethnicity of the other person.

Having grown up with Chinese [Malaysian] and Indian [Malaysian] friends in particular, it never occurred to me that they were to be treated differently. They were just my friends.

In Kedah, although it was a Malay state, there was no discrimination, although the Kedah civil service and the officer ranks of the Kedah state police were open only to educated boys from “good Malay” families. I remember when I was growing up, the state treasurer was a highly respected Chinese [Malaysian]. I grew up used to people of all races living and working together.

I have always believed that we are one people, the strength of our country is derived from our diversity. And I have always maintained long before (Prime Minister Datuk Seri) Najib (Razak) that tolerance was not good enough. Because it suggests our making small concessions that people are prepared to make, grudgingly. Acceptance of our cultural differences, on the other hand, that is really the key to a united Malaysian nation.

Tunku Aziz with Kofi Anan in New York, 2006, when he was special advisor to UN secretary-general

What does it mean to you coming from a royal Malay family, to have become a politician for all?

I feel a sense of responsibility as a Malaysian. That although I am not close to the throne, I carry the family title, and that means a great deal to me. Not to let the family down, and I supposem to protect the good name of the bigger family of Kedah.

I do my best and I am conscious of the fact there is a long history behind us of providing leadership. For a long time, I have been concerned with polarisation which is very much in evidence. I feel that unless we change the way we look at the issues of culture and race, Malaysia will continue to be plagued by all kinds of problems which will really [distract us] from developing the country to its fullest potential.

For that reason, I made up my mind, against my better judgement, to be in politics. I have no regrets. I thought it was all very well and good to stand on the sidelines and comment on the country’s state of affairs. But if I wanted to help make a difference to national unity and development, then I had to be prepared to stand up and be counted.

I have always been opposed to race-based politics because when you focus on your own race, then you are consciously or unconsciously setting yourself apart. The attitude you adopt is not one of inclusiveness but exclusiveness. So I looked for a party that met my hopes and aspirations and found the DAP fitted the bill.

But you served, worked with, and admired many individuals who very much worked for the Malay race.

I can explain this. [Tun] Ismail Ali was my governor at the central bank. I was persuaded to join [Bank Negara] because I was inspired by his attitude towards his race. But more important, towards his nation as a whole.

He wanted the best for his race, but that wasn’t ketuanan Melayu or Malay supremacy. It was to make Malays self-sufficient, strive for the best, be less dependent on government support and subsidies. Most of all, he wanted something for all Malaysians, and that was equality of opportunity.

For example, when I was Bank Negara’s appointments committee head, both he and I felt that we should always go for the best talent. He recognised Malay [Malaysians] had not yet reached that level, but given the time and right opportunity, they would rise to the occasion.

I remember one year when I appointed 22 young economists who were Chinese [Malaysians]. One person said, “Tunku, do you know that there is this thing called the NEP?” I said I was well aware of that policy but if we wanted the best people to serve the bank then we would have to take the best candidates, irrespective of race, creed or colour.

And I asked him whether he understood Bank Negara’s principles and functions. He hesitated. I then told him its function was to give the best possible independent monetary and financial advice to the Malaysian government. What sort of advice would we be giving if we did not recruit the right people? If I had to scrape the bottom for advisors, then that advice would not amount to much.

What are your hopes for Malaysia?

After more than 50 years of Independence, we have come to the end of the line, as far as Umno-dominated policies are concerned. Those policies have been adopted and noted more for their divisiveness rather than cohesiveness, because most of these policies have elements of discrimination.

Obviously, we need a change and this can only come about if a new set of people with progressive ideas; people who are convinced the country’s future must be in the hands of all citizens. The policies which have failed us should be abandoned. I am hopeful that left to themselves, the people know what they need and what is good for them.
Tunku Aziz with his daughter Dr Tunku Zelena Aziz during her graduation in 1994 in England

Our aspirations are similar in that we want a peaceful future, equal opportunities for our children and grandchildren. We must provide these opportunities. They need to feel that their country belongs to them, and that they can claim ownership without feeling marginalised, sidelined and discriminated against. Loyalty does not mean my country, right or wrong. It means I am prepared to work and make sacrifices because this is my country, my motherland.

Categories: Interview Tags:

SIME DARBY: A Conglomerate Gone Awry

June 19th, 2010 Tunku Aziz No comments

There is a place for conglomerates in the business world. However, as with everything else, some are good, but mostly they invariably become unwieldy and difficult to manage effectively. Many come unstuck, leaving behind a trail of miserable examples of management failures, human greed and frailties. As always, there is a lot of cleaning up to do after the party is over. The sad truth is that we do not as yet have what it takes to run a complex business successfully, and a conglomerate is hellishly difficult to keep on a straight course because the temptation to wander off into the unfamiliar is often irresistible, and most conglomerates find themselves up a creek.

There have been many instances of major failures in the Sime stables. There was the case of the insurance business in the UK in the eighties, a member of Lloyds, which was in such a bad shape because of mismanagement that it had to be bundled with a very profitable money broking company into an attractive package and sold for a song. Sime Darby naturally had to be responsible for all the liabilities resulting from claims on policies transacted up to the time of the sale of the company. For the next several years after the sale of the company to the new owners, Sime Darby continued to send out to the UK enormous sums of money to cover the claims.

Then there was the Sime Bank debacle. Banking was a business in which it had no expertise and had to rely on the management that came along with the bank when it was acquired. The integrity of the many of the top executives running Sime Bank was questionable. What happened to the bank should have been a lesson to the board of Sime Darby about sticking to what it was good at. I well remember in Windsor, England, saying jocularly to Tunku Tan Sri Ahmad Yahaya, then Group Chief Executive, when he told me Sime Darby had acquired a bank that he would be better off getting a casino licence. Later he admitted that I was right.

I also recall the factory ship fiasco in the early eighties. The Sime Darby-owned vessel operating in the North Atlantic off the coast of Africa found itself in rough seas financially. Sime Darby decided to sack its two British employees claiming that they had got into this business without the approval of the board in Kuala Lumpur. This was patently untrue. The Brits would not be bullied into submission, and they sued Sime Darby and its Chairman, then Tun Tan Siew Sin, for wrongful dismissal, and won a very substantial sum of money in an out of court settlement. Zubir, the dismissed Group Chief Executive should not have allowed the board of Sime Darby to treat him so shabbily.

I personally believe that with a loss of this scale of magnitude, an honourable board would have resigned because obviously it has failed to discharge its fiduciary and other related responsibilities of stewardship. Zubir has been used as a scapegoat in the Anglo-Malaysian corporate tradition. If Sime Darby had been an American company, the chair would have accepted responsibility and resigned or been forced to go without ceremony. I find Musa’s logic for staying put, saying that he would resign if required to do so by the shareholders, disingenuous and self-serving to say the least. He must know he has failed as chairman, and based on the principle of collective responsibility, his board must exit with him. This is the honourable thing expected of a responsible board, and this is what I expect the much trumpeted Sime tagline, ‘Developing Sustainable Futures’ to be all about. My advice to Zubir is to consider taking Musa and his board to the cleaners. Sue them. We need in this country boards that are principled, and we can also do with a little honour and integrity in our business leadership.

Sime Darby in the meantime must take a good, hard look at itself to see if operating on the present model is sustainable. It is obvious that Sime Darby has become largely unwieldy, unmanageable, and unsustainable. It is showing all the signs of having become a conglomerate in the worst possible sense. The worst is not over yet.

(The writer is a former Group Director of Sime Darby, 1979-1985)

Categories: Integrity Tags: